The Supreme Courtroom on Tuesday turned down conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’s attraction of a roughly $1.4 billion defamation judgment he owes for falsely claiming the Sandy Hook Elementary Faculty capturing was a hoax.
The temporary order ends Jones’s bid to stave off the staggering sum, which has plunged him into chapter 11 and will power him to surrender airing his Infowars present.
Jones’s Supreme Courtroom petition referred to as it “financial death penalty by fiat.” He stated his statements had been “lifted out of context” and the choose didn’t give sufficient weight to his First Modification arguments.
“Alex Jones is a media defendant entitled to all First Amendment freedom of the press protections,” the petition reads.
The justices didn’t seem to provide it a lot consideration, as they didn’t request the households reply to Jones’s petition.
“The Supreme Court properly rejected Jones’s latest desperate attempt to avoid accountability for the harm he has caused. We look forward to enforcing the jury’s historic verdict and making Jones and Infowars pay for what they have done,” Chris Mattei, an lawyer representing the households, stated in a press release.
It retains intact one of many largest defamation judgments in U.S. historical past, although it’s unclear how a lot the households will get better of the roughly $1.4 billion award.
Jones stays in chapter, and the households have moved in latest weeks to promote property owned by his firm, Free Speech Techniques. A choose lately confirmed these property aren’t a part of the chapter property and the households can pursue claims in state courtroom.
The households have lately satisfied a Texas state choose to nominate a receiver, although Jones is interesting the order.
He has warned that Infowars may very well be bought off to The Onion, a satirical information website. Final yr, The Onion entered the successful bid in an public sale to take management of Infowars, however it was blocked by the chapter choose.
“The Plaintiffs here are on the opposite side of the ideological spectrum and do not want money for their judgment,” Jones’s attorneys wrote to the justices. “Their initial motivations were to get Jones’s message off the air. But after entry of the devastating, record breaking $1,436,650,000 judgment, that motivation morphed to something more sinister.”
