A high Home Democrat is needling Republicans who helped go President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” by the decrease chamber final month however have since voiced regrets upon studying of sure provisions they didn’t know had been included within the 1,037-page package deal.
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), the vice chair of the Home Democratic Caucus, recommended the Republicans — who’ve lengthy accused Democrats of ramming large laws by Congress earlier than lawmakers can study what they’re voting for — are hypocrites for seemingly doing the identical with Trump’s home agenda.
“Now we see some Republican members who are opposed to it because — guess what? — they didn’t read the bill,” Lieu mentioned Wednesday throughout a press briefing within the Capitol.
With a late push from Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) muscled the president’s home want checklist by the Home within the early hours of Could 22, following a marathon in a single day debate. The vote was 215 to 214, with one conservative skeptic voting “present.”
Supporters have hailed the laws as transformative, offering tax cuts for many Individuals, cracking down on immigration and increasing home petroleum manufacturing.
However within the weeks because the invoice was handed, a number of Republicans have mentioned they’ve come to remorse their help after studying of particular language within the package deal.
Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) turned heads final week throughout a city corridor in his district, the place he acknowledged that he was unaware of a provision within the laws that might limit the facility of federal judges to carry authorities officers in contempt after they violate a court docket order.
“I am not going to hide the truth: This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,” Flood informed a jeering viewers, including that he would have opposed the package deal if he was conscious of the language sooner.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), considered one of Trump’s most vocal congressional allies, piled on this week, saying she additionally would have voted in opposition to the package deal if she had identified it included a 10-year moratorium on states regulating the unreal intelligence (AI) business. She famous that it violates the federalist philosophy that’s been a central tenet of conservatism for many years.
“Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the [bill] that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,” Greene wrote Tuesday on the social platform X. “I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.”
Lieu, who has been a pacesetter in Congress’s bipartisan effort to look at the societal impacts of synthetic intelligence, is not any fan of Greene. However on this difficulty, he mentioned he’s behind her one hundred pc.
“I agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene once every hundred years. This is that time,” Lieu mentioned.
“I agree that this 10-year provision is extreme. It’s going to cause unnecessary harm. And, look, I think the federal government is fine doing preemption when we preempt with something. You can’t just preempt with nothing,” he added. “It is a dangerous provision, and I hope the Senate will take out this 10-year moratorium.”
