Colorado River snowpack takes main dive; streamflow projections lowered

- Advertisement -

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A late-season rollercoaster experience this yr became a steep decline for snowpack ranges that feed the Colorado River.

Since April 9, when snowstorms pushed snowpack from 91% to simply over 100% in a single day, situations have modified dramatically and ranges have fallen to 70% of regular as of Friday, April 18. That is regarding for 40 million individuals who depend on the river for water.

The black line within the graph under exhibits this yr’s snowpack ranges, or extra technically, snow water equal (SWE) ranges, within the Higher Colorado River Basin.

Projections from the federal authorities have been adjusted, displaying much less water flowing into Lake Powell, the nation’s second-largest reservoir. Streamflow at Lake Powell is now anticipated to be about two-thirds of regular this yr (67%). Simply two weeks in the past, projections confirmed it will be about three-fourths of regular (74%).

The one-day flirtation with regular snowpack ranges is a distant reminiscence now.

And all of that’s taking place earlier than water will get so far as Lake Mead — the nation’s largest reservoir, the place Southern Nevada will get 90% of its water.

APRIL 4 REPORT: Snowpack at 90% of regular as ‘lean’ yr projected for Southern Nevada

“This has been another — unfortunately — classic year of the impact of climate change where high up in the Rocky Mountains in the headwaters of the Colorado River, you have slightly below average or average snowpack, which seems good on paper,” John Berggren, regional coverage supervisor for Western Useful resource Advocates, stated on Wednesday.

“But for a variety of reasons, that’s not translating to average runoff for the Colorado River,” he stated.

snowpack 04182025A map from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation exhibits precipitation and SWE ranges (blue-green packing containers), reservoir ranges (grey packing containers) and general Higher Colorado River Basin totals (vibrant blue field).

Berggren, based mostly in Boulder, Colorado, has been finding out water situations within the West for 15 years. He has a Ph.D. in water coverage and leads Colorado River work for the nonprofit.

Whereas the steep plunge in snowpack is troubling, there’s one thing else on Berggren’s thoughts: There isn’t any settlement in place but for a way the river can be managed when pointers expire subsequent yr.

The final main growth in that course of got here on March 7, when officers from decrease basin states (Nevada, Arizona and California) urged the Trump administration to put aside a choice by the outgoing Biden administration. Water officers stated the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation made a mistake by not together with an choice that will take into account infrastructure adjustments at Glen Canyon Dam.

“I don’t think decision makers are seriously considering enough, the fact that Glen Canyon Dam needs to be completely re-engineered,” Eric Balken, govt director of the nonprofit Glen Canyon Institute, stated in an April interview.

If the floor of Lake Powell drops under 3,490 ft above sea degree, the dam could be incapable of releasing sufficient water to fulfill necessities below the Colorado River Compact, generally known as the “Law of the River,” in accordance with an evaluation launched in 2022.

Lake Powell is presently 33% full, at 3,558 ft. Projections point out the reservoir’s low level over the following two years can be about 3,549 ft. That is about 33 ft under it is projected excessive level of three,581 ft.

The federal authorities has not replied publicly to the states’ request for a “do-over.”

John Berggren 04162025John Berggren, regional coverage supervisor for Western Useful resource Advocates. (KLAS)

“Unfortunately, politics gets involved and each upper and lower basin states have their negotiating positions. But we all here in the West rely on this river,” Berggren stated.

“You’re downstream, we’re upstream, we all rely on this river, and so not having an agreement is a big challenge and potentially harms the river and the people who rely on it,” he stated.

“We need the states to come together, we need them to agree, need them to find compromise, find ways to reach an agreement where we can all move forward with a healthy flowing Colorado River,” Berggren stated.

A report launched April 15 by the Bureau of Reclamation exhibits solely slight changes to anticipated reservoir ranges over the following two years regardless of the anticipated discount in streamflow.

However rewinding to 2024, the projections are fairly completely different from actuality. (Under, pages from the Bureau’s 24-month research displaying projections for Lake Mead and Lake Powell)

Lake Mead 24 month study 04182025Lake Powell 24 month study 04182025

The everyday low-water mark for Lake Mead is available in July annually. For this yr, that is anticipated to be 1,053.58 ft. A yr in the past, the projected degree for July 2025 was 1,048.24 ft, so the lake is now anticipated to be greater than 5 ft greater than projections from final yr.

Projections for Lake Powell are usually not as optimistic. Lake Powell’s low-water mark usually is available in April, simply earlier than spring runoff begins and reservoirs construct up. For this yr, that is anticipated to be 1,062.68 ft — about 9 ft decrease than projections from final yr (3571.24 ft).

Present ranges at Lake Mead and Lake Powell (click on arrow to advance)

Lake Mead 04182025Lake Powell 04182025

Getting nervous about lake ranges is not going to resolve something, however inaction could possibly be a much more damaging course. Berggren echoed feedback which were supplied some motivation for leaders to get forward of the choice earlier than it is too late.

“There is almost universal agreement that litigation should be the last resort by all means. If the states can’t reach an agreement, and this thing ends up in the Supreme Court, you’re looking at maybe a decade or longer for the Supreme Court to make a decision,” Berggren stated.

“And who knows … the only thing we know from that decision is there will be winners and losers, and we don’t know who the winners and losers would be. So it’s a huge risk to the states, it’s a risk to water users, it’s incredibly expensive, incredibly time-intensive process to potentially not know where you’re going to end up,” he stated.

- Advertisement -

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


More like this
Related

Nevada's 1st hashish lounge closes its doorways

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) -- With the closing of Thrive...

1 hospitalized with life-threatening accidents after east Las Vegas valley crash

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) -- An individual, who police stated...

Las Vegas valley group leaders' names enshrined at Historic Westside Legacy Park

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) -- On Saturday morning, Black enterprise...

Girl in vital situation following crash in central Las Vegas valley

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) -- A automobile hit a lady...